top of page
Tax Treaty Series

ITQ T-

063

October 30, 2020

Question

ACo, a company resident in A, is the parent of an MNE group.


Some years ago, ACo formed a 100% subsidiary, BCo, in B. ACo injected substantial share capital into BCo.


B has a relatively low corporate income tax rate and a wide treaty network.


Since its formation, BCo has had 1 employee (a bookkeeper) and 2 non-executive directors (supplied by a secretarial firm in B).


Shortly after B's formation, ACo and BCo entered into a cost contribution arrangement (CCA) to undertake R&D in regard to pharmaceuticals. Under the CCA:

  • All R&D is performed by ACo's R&D centre in A

  • BCo's obligation is to partially fund that R&D activity

  • The 2 companies will share the output from the R&D activity (i.e., patent rights for specific geographical areas) proportionate to their relative contributions (cash and R&D activity)


The R&D activity has led to the registration of several patents. In accordance with the CCA, ACo granted to BCo an exclusive, royalty-free licence of those patents (for BCo's geographical area) for their legal life

BCo has licensed those patents, for arm's length royalties, to several related companies – including CCo, a related operating company resident in C.


Following a recent tax audit, the A tax authorities have issued assessments to ACo which include in ACo's taxable income an amount equal to the royalties received by BCo – on the basis that BCo is not a valid participant in the CCA, under the OECD TPG, and that all of the DEMPE functions are performed by ACo.


The A/B, B/C & A/C treaties are identical to the 2017 OECD model treaty – the rate in Art. 12 is 0% in the B/C treaty, and 10% in the other two treaties.


Under domestic law, C levies a 20% withholding tax on outbound royalties.


Is C permitted to levy tax on the royalties paid by CCo to BCo?

Answer

Relevance of A tax authorities' TP adjustment to ACo


The TP adjustment to ACo is irrelevant to the treatment of royalties under the B/C treaty: see OECD TPG, para. 6.13.


Beneficial owner (B/O) status


Even if the TP analysis in regard to ACo is that there is a deemed service fee which is paid by BCo to ACo, that deemed payment would not cause BCo to fail the B/O conditions in the OECD Comm.


IMHO, BCo is the B/O of the royalties.


Nevertheless, some tax authorities in the position of C (e.g., China) have taken the position that, if BCo does not perform the DEMPE functions, it is not entitled to the treaty benefit for royalties. As mentioned above, that view is not supported by the OECD TPG.


PPT (Art. 29(9))


Based on the facts (in particular, the differential royalty withholding tax rates), it is possible that the PPT might be triggered by the ACo / BCo arrangement. Even though CCo is not the only company to which BCo licenses the patents, the PPT might apply if it can be shown that a reduction in the royalty withholding tax rate was a principal purpose for BCo licensing the patents to those companies, instead of ACo.


If the PPT is triggered, 20% C withholding tax would apply.


In that case, economic / juridical triple taxation would likely occur between the 3 countries (B might not grant a foreign tax credit for the C 20% withholding tax, on the basis that BCo qualifies for the 0% treaty rate). That might possibly be resolved under a tripartite MAP.

ITQ Disclaimer

This International Tax Quiz (ITQ) contains general information only, and none of International Insights Pte Ltd, its employees or directors is, by means of this ITQ, rendering professional advice or services. You use the content of this ITQ strictly at your own risk. You should not rely on all or any part of the content of this ITQ in making decisions to take action (including inaction) in regard to tax or other matters. Before making any decision or taking any action (including inaction) that may affect your tax position, your finances or your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. None of International Insights Pte Ltd, its employees or directors shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on the content of this ITQ.

© Copyright International Insights Pte Ltd. All rights reserved.

bottom of page